I do not knows where some people gets there morals, from the waste of the in-sink-erator? It seem like it when I read this story about a Chilean prostitute offering marathon sex at a telethon with money going towards handicapped kids.
I think the kids would be struck dumb and demoralised should they know that money is going towards them, and that is a handicap they would have to live with for the rest of their lives. Did this silly flasher ever think of that?
Not to mention what kind of handicap marathon sex can cause.
She say, "How can someone question a person who wants to put her job at the service of a noble cause?"
Perpetuating sexy is not a noble cause, I hasten to point out.
And I questoin her muchly.
It is like saying you would not question murder-for-hire for a cause. That is clearly wrong.
It is like saying you would not question a stripper who wish to strip for a cause. Clearly immoral.
It is like saying you would not question peoples who would swamp the market with porn for a cause. Clearly immoral.
It is like saying you would not question people who would sell short shorts and plastic sandals for a cause. That is ewwww!
It is like saying you would not question people who would sing death-metal for a cause. Save us all!
It is like saying you would not question any investment banker or politician who wish to continue in their job for a cause. Enough said.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I is appalled even more. Now after refusing the offer they has gone and saying they will takes the money, just so long as they don't encourage it. Well if publicly saying they is taking it is not encouraging this disgusting immoral act then I do not know what is. Talk about flip flops.
Also I thinks $4000 for 27 hours of sex is pretty cheap, comes to think of it. Julia Roberts' character got paid $3000 (and he say he was willing to pay $4000) for 7 days in "Pretty Woman", but most of it was just trotting about eating gourmet dinners in posh restaurants and going to the theatre and races and getting a rich man to pay for expensive Rodeo Drive wardrobes she could keep later. And she did not have to kiss on the mouth!
You would think for a charity auction someone would pay for more for non-stop more than a day sex.
This is what the world comes to.
The puppy wonders how one could manage 27 hours of non-stop sex. Wouldn't they get sore? Perhaps they could use some kind of lubricant to prevent soreness, but still...non-stop sex! 27 hours! It boggles the mind.
I think you would have to pay the lubricant overtime for that kind of work or it would stop lubricating!
Post a Comment