Monday, 26 May 2008

Porn by any other name still do not look like art

I know I know.

I has heard you crying out for it.

"Prudey why has you not jumped ont he bandwagon with all the others and hopped up and down and got mad at this filthy exhibition by Bill Henson which show a young teenage girl in the ... well not in anything which is the scandalous bit?"

Well I can say I has been very satisfied to see that some moral peoples has been jumping up and down and doing their moral bit and calling this exhibition for what it is.

Child porn.

It is not art.

It is child porn.

Do not hide behind the word "art". I sees you is not giving the girl much to hide behind so why try a trick like hiding behind something yourself?

Fortunately the police has seized the pics and I am satisfied that charges will be laid and hopefully there wil be a public stoning. Or something like that. I do not see why some people can takes lots of pics of a young girl in the nuddy and then walk away unscathed. It is wrong. It matters not that she say she gave permission. She cannot know what she was thinking. Many Children's rights Activists have rightly pointed out that a girl may give permission now but later look back at her childhood with regret and think "Oh no I did a bad thing" and then that is not good that would scar her. I agree completely.

She will look back on her life and think it is wrong, just like many girls who have not lived Prude's way in their life may do so.

Of course if you had been living Prude's way in their teenage lives they would be looking back at their lives and saying hip hip hooray for me I was a good moral person no regrets.

So there is a big difference who should be able to say which is the best way to live as a teenager.

And that person should not be Bill Henson.

It is the person who can make decisions where the teenager would not have regrets of course.

I thinks you is knowing who we is talking about.

8 comments:

Mr Mean said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Mr Mean said...

This kind of brooding, dramatic rubbish from those who see the world in largely black-and-white only arouses unadulterated outrage! Absolutely revolting.

mac said...

But, but, but... human form is teh artsy!!

Yeah, just kidding. Seriously, clothing is good. Clothing is kind of an art form too, so pictures of people wearing clothing is like twice the art in one package (art you can show grandmothers and prospective employers later in life, too). :D

prude said...

I think that is a good sell. Double the art for the same money. And the artists would be drawing art or photoing art so it would all be extra artsy. "Get your extra artsy here, Cheaper cheaper, double the value, double the value!" Oh that would be more of a sell than "naked girl naked girl" don't you thinks?

prude said...

Hmmm I guess there is two types of arts, arts you just have a fling with and arts you can take home and show off to the family and have a serious relationship with. Now which one would a NICE PERSON want to aspire to?

I think you have made the right selection!

Friendless said...

How come when he shows nudey pictures it's art, but when I show nudey pictures of myself to ladies on the bus it is called pornography and harrassment? It's not fair at all. But seriously, I cannot agree with any position where the same picture is art coming from one source and porn coming from another. That's double standards.

Friendless said...

Subscribing to follow-up comments.

Anonymous said...

Wacker, welche Wörter..., der glänzende Gedanke levitra preis viagra bestellen [url=http//t7-isis.org]levitra 10mg erfahrungen[/url]